Skip to content

Commit 76b98ce

Browse files
committed
fix stray recurse_collect left over from porting effort
1 parent 6c9e6fd commit 76b98ce

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

unpythonic/syntax/letdo.py

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ def transform(self, tree):
360360
for j, expr in enumerate(tree.elts, start=1):
361361
# Despite the recursion, this will not trigger false positives for nested do[] expressions,
362362
# because do[] is a second-pass macro, so they expand from inside out.
363-
expr, newnames = find_localdefs.recurse_collect(expr)
364-
expr, deletednames = find_deletes.recurse_collect(expr)
363+
expr, newnames = find_localdefs(expr)
364+
expr, deletednames = find_deletes(expr)
365365
if newnames and deletednames:
366366
raise SyntaxError("a do-item may have only local[] or delete[], not both") # pragma: no cover
367367
if newnames:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)