We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
1 parent 6c9e6fd commit 76b98ceCopy full SHA for 76b98ce
unpythonic/syntax/letdo.py
@@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ def transform(self, tree):
360
for j, expr in enumerate(tree.elts, start=1):
361
# Despite the recursion, this will not trigger false positives for nested do[] expressions,
362
# because do[] is a second-pass macro, so they expand from inside out.
363
- expr, newnames = find_localdefs.recurse_collect(expr)
364
- expr, deletednames = find_deletes.recurse_collect(expr)
+ expr, newnames = find_localdefs(expr)
+ expr, deletednames = find_deletes(expr)
365
if newnames and deletednames:
366
raise SyntaxError("a do-item may have only local[] or delete[], not both") # pragma: no cover
367
if newnames:
0 commit comments