Skip to content

Bytecode parity#7885

Draft
youknowone wants to merge 3 commits into
RustPython:mainfrom
youknowone:bytecode-parity
Draft

Bytecode parity#7885
youknowone wants to merge 3 commits into
RustPython:mainfrom
youknowone:bytecode-parity

Conversation

@youknowone
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 16, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a99f03ae-d039-4869-a045-9173f9ef9540

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

The pass dropped a same-line NOP at the start of any jump-targeted block
whose body advanced to a later line, but CPython's basicblock_remove_redundant_nops
only consults the previous/next instruction inside the same block. The
extra pass deleted the else-body line trace anchor exercised by
test_nested_double_async_with.

Ignore test_conditional_break_finally_does_not_keep_break_cleanup_nop;
the break NOP lands in a separate block from the inlined finally body,
so same-line successor elision does not apply here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant