Commit e3b243d
authored
Add CODEOWNERS — auto-request reviewer routing (JavaScriptSolidServer#426)
Routes review requests for path categories explicitly:
- Default (*) — @melvincarvalho
- Auth / security paths (src/auth, src/idp, src/utils/ssrf.js) —
@melvincarvalho explicitly, signalling security-sensitive surface
- CLI / release surface (bin/, package.json, package-lock.json) —
@melvincarvalho explicitly, since these affect what npm publishes
- Legal / policy substrate (LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING.md, .github/) —
@melvincarvalho explicitly
Currently all paths route to the same maintainer; the per-path
breakdown documents review responsibility intent for paths that
should always get explicit maintainer review when contribution
volume grows or co-maintainers are added.
No enforcement: this just causes GitHub to auto-request review
from listed owners on PRs touching matching paths. Without a
branch-protection rule requiring CODEOWNERS approval the request
is advisory.1 parent 51034fe commit e3b243d
1 file changed
Lines changed: 27 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
0 commit comments