Skip to content

Metadata #3

Open
Open

Description

@jasssonpet

Windows Runtime Metadata

  • Namespaces
    • Name
    • List of children
  • Classes
    • Name
    • Is instantiable/sealed
    • Base class
    • Default interface
    • List of implemented interfaces
    • List of constructors
    • List of methods
    • List of properties
    • List of events
    • Find members by name
  • Structures
    • Name
    • List of fields
      • Field name
      • Field type
  • Interfaces
    • Name
    • GUID
    • List of implemented interfaces
    • List of methods
    • List of properties
    • List of events
    • Find members by name
  • Delegates
    • Name
    • GUID
    • Invoke method
  • Enumerations
    • Name
    • Type
    • List of members
      • Member name
      • Member value
  • Methods
    • Name, explicit interface implementation name
    • Is instance/static
    • Overload name
    • Is default overload
    • Is overridable
    • Index in declaring interface
    • Return type
    • List of parameters
  • Parameters
    • Name
    • Type
    • [In], [Out]
  • Properties
    • Name, explicit interface implementation name
    • Is instance/static
    • Getter/Setter method
    • Is overridable
  • Events
    • Name, explicit interface implementation name
    • Is instance/static
    • Add/Remove method
    • Is overridable
  • Generics
    • Open interfaces, delegates
      • List of generic parameters
    • Closed interfaces, delegates
      • Generate name
      • Generate GUID
  • Availability
    • Skip internal and compiler generated (property getter/setter, event add/remove, constructor)
    • Skip obsolete declarations
    • Skip declarations not available on the current platform family
    • Skip selected [WebHostHidden]

Activity

  1. icode commented on Sep 28, 2016

    @icode

    Did not continue the work?

  2. miffels commented on Sep 30, 2016

    @miffels

    Seeing that seemingly there has not been activity within the past 7 months, I too would like to know if {N} on Windows is still something you are actively pursuing.

  3. donangel commented on Sep 30, 2016

    @donangel

    Seeing what's happening on the Windows Phone front, I don't think the current situation would justify the investment in supporting precisely that technology.

    However, UWP support will be something really interesting!

  4. miffels commented on Sep 30, 2016

    @miffels

    @donangel You are not by any chance a contributor? I was hoping for a comment from the team.

    Edit: Don't get me wrong, I agree in UWP being what we probably really want in terms of Windows/Mobile :)

  5. jasssonpet commented on Oct 3, 2016

    @jasssonpet
    ContributorAuthor

    Hey guys, the work on the metadata is somewhat complete and enough for further development. Let's keep comments here related to the issue so please comment here for more general information about Windows support and NativeScript: NativeScript/NativeScript#254

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions