You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/references/bib.bib
+1Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ @inproceedings{hattori:2008
608
608
abstract = {Information contained in versioning system commits has been frequently used to support software evolution research. Concomitantly, some researchers have tried to relate commits to certain activities, e.g., large commits are more likely to be originated from code management activities, while small ones are related to development activities. However, these characterizations are vague, because there is no consistent definition of what is a small or a large commit. In this paper, we study the nature of commits in two dimensions. First, we define the size of commits in terms of number of files, and then we classify commits based on the content of their comments. To perform this study, we use the history log of nine large open source projects.},
609
609
author = {Lile P. Hattori and Michele Lanza},
610
610
booktitle = {ASE Workshops 2008. 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering - Workshops, 2008.},
611
+
doi = {10.1109/ASEW.2008.4686322},
611
612
keywords = {history, software systems, frequency, statistical distributions, inspection, informatics, research and development management, content management, project management, engineering management, metrics, git, commits},
0 commit comments