You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/references/bib.bib
+17-2Lines changed: 17 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ @article{hormann:1993
550
550
year = {1993},
551
551
}
552
552
553
-
@article{riehle2012,
553
+
@article{riehle:2012,
554
554
abstract = {The design of software development tools follows from what the developers of such tools believe is true about software development. A key aspect of such beliefs is the size of code contributions (commits) to a software project. In this paper, we show that what tool developers think is true about the size of code contributions is different by more than an order of magnitude from reality. We present this reality, called the commit size distribution, for a large sample of open source and selected closed source projects. We suggest that these new empirical insights will help improve software development tools by aligning underlying design assumptions closer with reality.},
555
555
author = {Dirk Riehle and Carsten Kolassa and Michel A. Salim},
556
556
issn = {1617-5468},
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ @article{riehle2012
563
563
year = {2012},
564
564
}
565
565
566
-
@inproceedings{arafat2009,
566
+
@inproceedings{arafat:2009,
567
567
abstract = {With the growing economic importance of open source, we need to improve our understanding of how open source software development processes work. The analysis of code contributions to open source projects is an important part of such research. In this paper we analyze the size of code contributions to more than 9,000 open source projects. We review the total distribution and distinguish three categories of code contributions using a size-based heuristic: single focused commits, aggregate team contributions, and repository refactorings. We find that both the overall distribution and the individual categories follow a power law. We also suggest that distinguishing these commit categories by size will benefit future analyses.},
568
568
author = {Oliver Arafat and Dirk Riehle},
569
569
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences},
@@ -572,3 +572,18 @@ @inproceedings{arafat2009
572
572
title = {{The Commit Size Distribution of Open Source Software}},
573
573
year = {2009},
574
574
}
575
+
576
+
@inbook{hofmann:2009,
577
+
abstract = {The quantitative analysis of software projects can provide insights that let us better understand open source and other software development projects. An important variable used in the analysis of software projects is the amount of work being contributed, the commit size. Unfortunately, post-facto, the commit size can only be estimated, not measured. This paper presents several algorithms for estimating the commit size. Our performance evaluation shows that simple, straightforward heuristics are superior to the more complex text-analysis-based algorithms. Not only are the heuristics significantly faster to compute, they also deliver more accurate results when estimating commit sizes. Based on this experience, we design and present an algorithm that improves on the heuristics, can be computed equally fast, and is more accurate than any of the prior approaches.},
578
+
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
579
+
author = {Philipp Hofmann and Dirk Riehle},
580
+
bookTitle = {{Open Source Ecosystems: Diverse Communities Interacting: 5th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference on Open Source Systems, OSS 2009, Sk\"{o}vde, Sweden, June 3-6, 2009. Proceedings}},
581
+
doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-02032-2_11},
582
+
editor = {Cornelia Boldyreff and Kevin Crowston and Bj\"{o}rn Lundell and Anthony I. Wasserman},
0 commit comments