Matt's latest revision

andrewtobin · andrewtobin · commit bb569a1be5a4 · 2012-04-19T20:17:27.000+10:00
diff --git a/_posts/2012-04-19-show-and-tell-mabster.md b/_posts/2012-04-19-show-and-tell-mabster.md
@@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ I decided to use good ol' `System.Net.WebRequest` when making my calls to Twitte
 
 That returns a running Task which is performing the request and will return the response in the `Result` property.
 
+Budgie, however, doesn't use it. Why? Because I wanted all HTTP requests in Budgie to honour a Timeout property, and WebRequest doesn't honour its own Timeout property unless you use the synchronous `GetResponse` method. So my code actually looks like this:
+
+    return Task.Factory.StartNew(() => request.GetResponse());
+
+It could be argued that that's actually _more_ readable. :)
+
 From there I can use a continuation (since Budgie is written using C# 4 and doesn't make use of the "await" keyword) to take action when the task completes:
 
     return requestTask.ContinueWith(t =>
@@ -84,4 +90,4 @@ All in all, it's pretty easy! Easier still had I written this code with C# 5, bu
 
 ## Wrapping Up
 
-Using the TPL to create an asynchronous API is the logical choice in modern .NET development, and I wouldn't have done anything different in Budgie. I'm looking forward to the final release of VS11 and .NET 4.5, at which point I'll refactor the code to make use of the "await" keyword, but for now it's good to know that you can do this in a future-proof way with the current tools.
+Using the TPL to create an asynchronous API is the logical choice in modern .NET development, and I wouldn't have done anything different in Budgie. I'm looking forward to the final release of VS11 and .NET 4.5, at which point I'll refactor the code to make use of the "await" keyword, but for now it's good to know that you can do this in a future-proof way with the current tools.
