fix: namespace nodes behave with compaction (backport to v1.13.x) - #2668
Merged
flavorjones merged 3 commits intoOct 16, 2022
Merged
Conversation
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-namespace-scopes-compaction_v1.13.x
branch
from
October 15, 2022 17:25
3864bf5 to
7b369e5
Compare
flavorjones
marked this pull request as draft
October 16, 2022 01:49
Co-Authored-By: Matt Valentine-House <matt@eightbitraptor.com> Co-Authored-By: Peter Zhu <peter@peterzhu.ca>
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-namespace-scopes-compaction_v1.13.x
branch
from
October 16, 2022 15:14
3864bf5 to
73d73d6
Compare
flavorjones
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 16, 2022 15:34
flavorjones
deleted the
flavorjones-namespace-scopes-compaction_v1.13.x
branch
October 16, 2022 17:13
This was referenced Oct 18, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem is this PR intended to solve?
Backport of #2658