Skip to content

Fix gcc error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always …#8309

Merged
acozzette merged 1 commit intoprotocolbuffers:masterfrom
Romain-Geissler-1A:master
Mar 2, 2021
Merged

Fix gcc error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always …#8309
acozzette merged 1 commit intoprotocolbuffers:masterfrom
Romain-Geissler-1A:master

Conversation

@Romain-Geissler-1A
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Romain-Geissler-1A Romain-Geissler-1A commented Feb 18, 2021

…true [-Werror=type-limits]

This fixes the following build error:

In file included from no_warning_test.cc:7:
../../src/google/protobuf/parse_context.h: In instantiation of 'const char* google::protobuf::internal::EpsCopyInputStream::AppendUntilEnd(const char*, const A&) [with A = google::protobuf::internal::EpsCopyInputStream::AppendString(const char*, std::string*)::<lambda(const char*, ptrdiff_t)>]':
../../src/google/protobuf/parse_context.h:366:70:   required from here
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:161:48: error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always true [-Werror=type-limits]
  161 | #define GOOGLE_CHECK_GE(A, B) GOOGLE_CHECK((A) >= (B))
      |                                                ^
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:151:5: note: in definition of macro 'GOOGLE_LOG_IF'
  151 |   !(CONDITION) ? (void)0 : GOOGLE_LOG(LEVEL)
      |     ^~~~~~~~~
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:161:31: note: in expansion of macro 'GOOGLE_CHECK'
  161 | #define GOOGLE_CHECK_GE(A, B) GOOGLE_CHECK((A) >= (B))
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:201:26: note: in expansion of macro 'GOOGLE_CHECK_GE'
  201 | #define GOOGLE_DCHECK_GE GOOGLE_CHECK_GE
      |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../src/google/protobuf/parse_context.h:351:7: note: in expansion of macro 'GOOGLE_DCHECK_GE'
  351 |       GOOGLE_DCHECK_GE(chunk_size, static_cast<size_t>(0));
      |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

Indeed gcc is true, comparing size_t value >= 0 is always true.

Cheers,
Romain

…true [-Werror=type-limits]

This fixes the following build error:
In file included from no_warning_test.cc:7:
../../src/google/protobuf/parse_context.h: In instantiation of 'const char* google::protobuf::internal::EpsCopyInputStream::AppendUntilEnd(const char*, const A&) [with A = google::protobuf::internal::EpsCopyInputStream::AppendString(const char*, std::string*)::<lambda(const char*, ptrdiff_t)>]':
../../src/google/protobuf/parse_context.h:366:70:   required from here
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:161:48: error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always true [-Werror=type-limits]
  161 | #define GOOGLE_CHECK_GE(A, B) GOOGLE_CHECK((A) >= (B))
      |                                                ^
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:151:5: note: in definition of macro 'GOOGLE_LOG_IF'
  151 |   !(CONDITION) ? (void)0 : GOOGLE_LOG(LEVEL)
      |     ^~~~~~~~~
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:161:31: note: in expansion of macro 'GOOGLE_CHECK'
  161 | #define GOOGLE_CHECK_GE(A, B) GOOGLE_CHECK((A) >= (B))
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~
../../src/google/protobuf/stubs/logging.h:201:26: note: in expansion of macro 'GOOGLE_CHECK_GE'
  201 | #define GOOGLE_DCHECK_GE GOOGLE_CHECK_GE
      |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../src/google/protobuf/parse_context.h:351:7: note: in expansion of macro 'GOOGLE_DCHECK_GE'
  351 |       GOOGLE_DCHECK_GE(chunk_size, static_cast<size_t>(0));
      |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
@Romain-Geissler-1A
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @acozzette,

I see one build failure for MacOS Ruby however when I click the link i can't see any build information. I doubt removing this assert can have any effect anywhere, especially if all other builds are green. Is it ok to merge this pull request despite the failing build ?

Cheers,
Romain

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants