When we introduced this feature, I had some specific usecases in mind which required an AND relationship with types -- it comes to mind that some tools would like to use an OR relationship, but there isn't a great way to implement this without reverting to files (and thus losing the benefits of types altogether!).
This issue is to track some sort of way of enabling an OR relationship.
This was originally inspired by prettier/prettier#2745
When we introduced this feature, I had some specific usecases in mind which required an
ANDrelationship withtypes-- it comes to mind that some tools would like to use anORrelationship, but there isn't a great way to implement this without reverting tofiles(and thus losing the benefits oftypesaltogether!).This issue is to track some sort of way of enabling an
ORrelationship.This was originally inspired by prettier/prettier#2745