expect: Improve report when mock-spy matcher fails, part 3#8697
Merged
pedrottimark merged 2 commits intojestjs:masterfrom Jul 16, 2019
Merged
expect: Improve report when mock-spy matcher fails, part 3#8697pedrottimark merged 2 commits intojestjs:masterfrom
pedrottimark merged 2 commits intojestjs:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
Definitely a bugfix 🙂 |
SimenB
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2019
This was referenced Dec 31, 2019
This was referenced Jan 7, 2020
This was referenced Jan 21, 2020
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Throw matcher error if
nis not a positive safe integer:toHaveBeenNthCalledWithandnthCalledWithtoHaveNthReturnedWithandnthReturnedWithBecause baseline code returns
pass: falsea negative assertion with invalidncannot fail :(Do y’all think to throw error instead of false negative (pardon pun) as:
For consistency with other matcher errors, display
receivedinstead ofjest.fn()or mock namematcherName.slice(1)is temporary until future pull requests which will delete period from names in calls to create matcher functions.Test plan
Example pictures baseline at left and improved at right
Examples of positive assertions:
Examples of negative assertions: