[SUREFIRE-2095] Fork crash doesn't fail build with -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true when run with failsafe#545
Conversation
…re.ignore=true when run with failsafe Verify goal should fail when test summary indicates a SurefireBooterForkException occurred
|
@olamy I updated the PR description to add some clarification. I don't think this is really the best solution but I did it this way to align with what you and @Tibor17 agreed on for surefire-1426. I think ideally for both surefire and failsafe the build succeeds (as documented for maven.test.failure.ignore), however somewhere in ForkStarter when we see the non-zero exit code we make sure to create the |
|
@br0nstein |
|
@Tibor17 thanks please let me know how we can go from here to get this problem fixed. Should we try to update the test to actually crash the JVM at runtime rather than cause JVM startup to fail in case that were to be caught by failsafe differently? Not sure if there are any ripe unpatched JVM bugs that we could utilize, heh. Want to double check that we do want to pursue this approach of causing the verify phase to fail rather than treat this like non-crashing failing tests with test.failure.ignore enabled, by writing out some test result XML that Jenkins/etc could pick up to treat as "unstable." |
|
Resolve #3127 |
When
maven.test.failure.ignoreis enabled, a test that crashes the JVM (e.g. that causes an OOM, with-XX:+CrashOnOutOfMemoryError) currently does not cause a build failure. This is perhaps the right behavior but is an issue in a CI setting because the following:Because of that, in a Jenkins setting, the Jenkins Junit plugin does not identify any test failures and the build is marked successful instead of unstable. The forked process crash is only identified in the failsafe-summary XML (in the failureMessage) which AFAIK the Junit plugin does not parse to drive the build status.
This PR ensures that whether test failures are configured to be ignored or not, such a crash in the forked process by the failsafe plugin will always fail the build, to match the new behavior for the surefire plugin in SUREFIRE-1426.
This PR updates the VerifyMojo to pass a SurefireBooterForkException (deserialized from the failureMessage output to the summary XML from the IntegrationTestMojo run prior) to reportExecution so the build is terminated with a MojoExecutionException the same way as it is when tests are run by the surefire plugin (AbstractSurefireMojo).
See 6e60b03 for the corresponding fix for the surefire plugin (SUREFIRE-1426), that this leverages.
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not
require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
pulling in other changes.
[SUREFIRE-XXX] - Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles,where you replace
SUREFIRE-XXXwith the appropriate JIRA issue. Best practiceis to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the first line of the
commit message.
mvn clean installto make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check willbe performed on your pull request automatically.
mvn -Prun-its clean install).If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.
To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.