docs: MD053 unused link definitions#16376
Merged
mdjermanovic merged 1 commit intoeslint:mainfrom Oct 3, 2022
Merged
Conversation
|
Hi @nschonni!, thanks for the Pull Request The first commit message isn't properly formatted. We ask that you update the message to match this format, as we use it to generate changelogs and automate releases.
To Fix: You can fix this problem by running Read more about contributing to ESLint here |
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-eslint canceled.
|
mdjermanovic
approved these changes
Oct 3, 2022
Member
mdjermanovic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks!
These link definitions were used in the now-removed table of contents (#15999).
crapStone
pushed a commit
to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2022
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [eslint](https://eslint.org) ([source](https://github.com/eslint/eslint)) | devDependencies | minor | [`8.24.0` -> `8.25.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/eslint/8.24.0/8.25.0) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>eslint/eslint</summary> ### [`v8.25.0`](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/releases/tag/v8.25.0) [Compare Source](eslint/eslint@v8.24.0...v8.25.0) #### Features - [`173e820`](eslint/eslint@173e820) feat: Pass --max-warnings value to formatters ([#​16348](eslint/eslint#16348)) (Brandon Mills) - [`6964cb1`](eslint/eslint@6964cb1) feat: remove support for ignore files in FlatESLint ([#​16355](eslint/eslint#16355)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`1cc4b3a`](eslint/eslint@1cc4b3a) feat: `id-length` counts graphemes instead of code units ([#​16321](eslint/eslint#16321)) (Sosuke Suzuki) #### Documentation - [`90c6028`](eslint/eslint@90c6028) docs: Conflicting fixes ([#​16366](eslint/eslint#16366)) (Ben Perlmutter) - [`5a3fe70`](eslint/eslint@5a3fe70) docs: Add VS to integrations page ([#​16381](eslint/eslint#16381)) (Maria José Solano) - [`49bd1e5`](eslint/eslint@49bd1e5) docs: remove unused link definitions ([#​16376](eslint/eslint#16376)) (Nick Schonning) - [`3bd380d`](eslint/eslint@3bd380d) docs: typo cleanups for docs ([#​16374](eslint/eslint#16374)) (Nick Schonning) - [`b3a0837`](eslint/eslint@b3a0837) docs: remove duplicate words ([#​16378](eslint/eslint#16378)) (Nick Schonning) - [`a682562`](eslint/eslint@a682562) docs: add `BigInt` to `new-cap` docs ([#​16362](eslint/eslint#16362)) (Sosuke Suzuki) - [`f6d57fb`](eslint/eslint@f6d57fb) docs: Update docs README ([#​16352](eslint/eslint#16352)) (Ben Perlmutter) - [`7214347`](eslint/eslint@7214347) docs: fix logical-assignment-operators option typo ([#​16346](eslint/eslint#16346)) (Jonathan Wilsson) #### Chores - [`1f78594`](eslint/eslint@1f78594) chore: upgrade [@​eslint/eslintrc](https://github.com/eslint/eslintrc)[@​1](https://github.com/1).3.3 ([#​16397](eslint/eslint#16397)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`8476a9b`](eslint/eslint@8476a9b) chore: Remove CODEOWNERS ([#​16375](eslint/eslint#16375)) (Nick Schonning) - [`720ff75`](eslint/eslint@720ff75) chore: use "ci" for Dependabot commit message ([#​16377](eslint/eslint#16377)) (Nick Schonning) - [`42f5479`](eslint/eslint@42f5479) chore: bump actions/stale from 5 to 6 ([#​16350](eslint/eslint#16350)) (dependabot\[bot]) - [`e5e9e27`](eslint/eslint@e5e9e27) chore: remove `jsdoc` dev dependency ([#​16344](eslint/eslint#16344)) (Milos Djermanovic) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox. --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzMi4yMjEuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjMyLjIyNi4wIn0=--> Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1577 Reviewed-by: crapStone <crapstone@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Was looking at updating to the newer version of the Markdown library/CLI2 but realized that it now requires Node 14, so I just submitted the new rule fixes in the file that were flagged
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?